Skip to main content

Professional Development For Me


Professional Development

Currently I am part of a Professional development course which is a core requirement to teach a Diploma level course at my School about teaching with digital technologies. Its been almost two weeks since this course has started, and every day I have ended up learning something.

My understanding of professional development is something that is on going, a process which never stops. We do not  need any formal courses to further build or enhance our understanding regarding a topic, concept etc. Things can be learned in any situation. Ken Keyes says, "everyone and everything around you is your teacher".  I find this amazingly  true, we learn from each other, by simply observing actions, by simply talking about things we observe, by reading something that has intrigued us, by listening to some ones ideas and so on. Learning never stops, the methodology, the process of acquisition is different.

The reading material shared during this course too says that PD is an ongoing process. It further lists the steps that lead to professional development.  It begins with identifying an area of practice and researching or exploring about it, followed by planning and developing a practical solution to it, putting the solution into practice in the real world and finally reflecting and evaluating.

We had an interesting discussion on what constitutes effective professional development,  one of the candidates shared a research, from an American Educational Research Journal (Dec. 21, 2001 Vol 38. No 4 pp 915 - 945) which cites three features of professional development activities that have significant, positive effects on teachers' self-reported increases in knowledge and skills and changes in classroom practices: (a) focus on content knowledge; (b) opportunities for active learning; and (c) coherence with other learning activities. I found it very relevant. It all talks about key ingredients of professional development. It talks of embedness ,how carefully things are linked together, are in context and make sense. 

One of the colleagues had shared something worth thinking by Hoff (1982) which inspired me a lot and i really enjoyed reading several times, actually helped me reflect on what was i doing all this time.
How can you get very far,
If you don’t know Who You Are?
How can you do what you ought,
If you don’t know What You’ve Got?
And if you don’t know Which To Do
Of all the things in front of you,
Then what you’ll have when you are through
Is just a mess without a clue
Of all the best that can come true
If you know What and Which and Who.
   (Hoff 1982: 58)

 I went through the research carried by UNESCO in 2008 which defines 10 principles of effective professional development. All principles are important and need to be integrated with one another. While skimming through the UNESCO report, the first principle about focus on valued outcomes caught my attention. Success should not depend on the mastery of teachers skills but how positively has this impacted the learning outcomes. We often forget to gauge the impact on student learning. Kolbs experiential cycle could actually help us reflect better on our practices.

Another principle about assessment for inquiry which links what learners need to know and do with what teachers need to know and do seemed very pertinent. It links students learning needs to teacher professional learning needs. I like the idea of self-regulatory skills where teachers seek feedback on their efforts.

Another principle about developing approaches responsive to the learning process made me think about our own teachers and how they respond to change. Teachers often reject ideas that conflict with their current practices. I really like the idea about how to go about this conflict,  Its all about demonstrating effective alternative practices, develop new knowledge and skills and make small changes to practices and observe positive change sin students learning outcomes.
I found the reading valuable and it really helped build and clarify ideas.

The whole process has enhanced my thinking about professional development. Its a whole world in itself. If we want professional development courses to be successful in our schools we need to start thinking of a number of things, a complete follow up of all courses taught, regular support to colleagues, skilled and trained education leaders who support their colleagues/staff , proper infrastructure in place to support professional development etc only then will PD have the impact we wish to see in our schools.

In simple term PD means growing UP both cognitively and socially. I might be wrong but just a thought.
Sheeba Ajmal

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Choice Boards, Play lists and Hyper docs

 Choice boards, playlists and hyper docs Exploring Choice boards, playlists and pathways This is a very interesting new blog post that will introduce you all to three new ways  of making learning personalized in your classrooms. This is to do with providing  differentiated learning experiences to the students in the class. How do we do this?  by giving them voice and choice. This means they have a say in the learning activities,  they choose which activities they want to do, to achieve a particular learning objective.  All these tools lead to enhancement of the 4cs communication, collaboration, creativity  and critical thinking. It also enhances students engagement. These tools also support  students with multiple intelligences.  These are intentional, data driven and goal drive.  The purpose is the same , giving students the ownership of the learning and the learning process. But all three are different from each other. lets explore each of these in detail with examples. What are Choi

Introducing Computational Thinking in Classrooms

Introducing Computational Thinking in Classrooms Date: 26th May 2019/Sunday/12:18 PM           27th May 2019/Monday/1:55 PM This blog post is inspired from my dive into my recent course i.e Computational Thinking for Every Educator Course offered by the ISTE International Society of Technology Education. It had a lot of insight to offer about Computational Thinking, its four key components i.e Decomposition, Pattern Recognition, Abstraction and Algorithms, its practical applications in classrooms, designing lesson plans and activities incorporating Computational Thinking in your classrooms. What amazed me was that its completely different to Computer Science, as educators we often confuse the two terms, though they are completely different from each other . Lets dive in and figure out how. So let's begin with our understanding of what is Computer Science ? Computer Science as per definitions explored onlin1 (1) its the study of information (data) and how it can be manip

Differentiated VS Personalized VS Individualized Learning

Differentiated VS Personalized VS Individualized Learning Date: 23/09/2018 Sunday This blogpost is inspired from my twitter chat today organized by #edchatmena about individualized, personalized and differentiated learning.  It was so good to interact with a very experienced and knowledgeable group of educators who were able to share some amazing resources about the three different learning approaches. I did have some understanding about differentiated learning in classrooms, but the twitter chat helped build a much clearer understanding of the three approaches.  According to an article by Dale Basye differentiation is a type of learning where instruction is tailored to meet the needs of learners in class, the learning objectives remain the same, but teachers can use different resources, different strategies , providing students different paths to students to achieve their learning goals. There are different types of differentiation. Lets look at each in detail. Though t